Skip to main content

Longboard

Insights: Notes from the Trading Desk: What Was That?
Share:

Notes from the Trading Desk: What Was That?

Recent volatility reveals vulnerability in unbalanced portfolios

It’s been a few weeks since the volatility blow up in February sent stocks lower, and many investors may still be scared or scratching their heads as to what caused the correction. Now that the dust seems to have settled, we thought it was a good time to provide Longboard’s view on those events, and the impact they could have going forward.

 

The real danger of volatility

On Friday February 2, employment data indicated higher wage inflation. Inflation was notably elusive during the global recovery, and some investors started to get concerned that the U.S. Federal Reserve would tighten interest rates faster than planned. On February 5, stocks started to look shaky and volatility (as measured by the CBOE Volatility Index, or VIX) began to rise. By the next day, volatility had spiked and stocks were not looking good.

At one point on Monday February 6, the VIX spiked to levels that historically have come before a -20% stock correction. We interpreted this “volatility overshoot” as the canary in the coal mine. There were concerns about high equity valuations and contained volatility. Yet it seemed to us that the subdued equity volatility was most vulnerable. Volatility is particularly dangerous because it is an input to many trading strategies, including options and credit trading.

 

Technical vs. fundamental sell-off

During the global financial crisis, we saw credit tighten followed by stocks crashing. Then equity volatility spiked. In early February, we saw this pattern in reverse. Equity volatility spiked, followed by stocks suffering. Yet, credit remained functional, market liquidity remained reasonable and funding was available.

Our view at the time was that, although things weren’t pretty, they weren’t scary either. The episodic equity sell-off in February is now behind us and March seems to be bringing its own set of challenges.  Much remains to be seen in terms of the future path of the stock market but the tone of market participants is different.

Goldman Sachs pointed out that stocks held by hedge funds outperformed. That indicates this was a technical sell-off, instead of a fundamental one. What’s more, many technical traders believe this type of price action can be healthy for stocks in the long run. Even if stocks are technically healthier, we’re hearing more conversations about the next leg lower and a real recession.

 

So, why did some funds close and some funds outperform?

As is often the case, it comes down to a commitment to robust risk management. When macro themes persist for a long period of time – for example, the persistent subdued volatility theme we saw during the global financial recovery – they have a tendency to seep into a variety of areas.

Without the experience of changing macro themes and the awareness that markets can change on a dime, risk can become concentrated and portfolios can become vulnerable. The assumption that volatility would never spike proved catastrophic for anyone who allowed hopes for a higher return to supersede realistic risk management.  Said another way, defense wins championships.

 

The benefits of rule-based investing

Investors were aware that historically low volatility would not continue forever. They had voiced concerns over historically high equity valuations for months. After all, we are currently in the third-longest expansionary cycle in U.S. history (105 months). February just reminded us how vulnerable an oversubscribed stock market is.

The good news is that rules-based investing helps keep investors unemotional when others panic. This approach stays committed to preserving and growing wealth, while utilizing dynamic, risk management processes. Best of all, trend following strategies offer the potential for positive returns in both bull and bear cycles.

So, let the wind of change come or not. We believe we’re more than ready for it either way.

Disclosures

Longboard Asset Management, LP (LAM) is registered as an investment advisor with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and only transacts business in states where it is properly registered, or is excluded or exempted from registration requirements. SEC registration does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the Commission, nor does it indicate that the advisor has attained a particular level of skill or ability. LAM is also registered with the National Futures Association.

This website is limited to the dissemination of general information pertaining to its advisory services, together with access to additional investment-related information, publications and links. The information on this site does not involve the rendering of personalized investment advice. You should consult a professional advisor before using any of the information, pursuing any of the investment ideas or implementing any of the strategies presented. We believe the information we present is factual and up-to-date, but we do not guarantee its accuracy and you should not should not regard it as a complete and exhaustive analysis of the subjects we discuss. Our opinions reflect our judgment as of the date of publication and are subject to change.

Prospective clients can view the firm’s Form ADV and Part 2A Disclosure Brochure as filed with the SEC at http://www.adviserinfo.sec.gov/IAPD/Content/IapdMain/iapd_SiteMap.aspx or contact us for a copy.

The content of this website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal or tax advice. Always consult an attorney or tax professional regarding your specific legal or tax situation. Longboard Asset Management, LP does not provide legal, tax, accounting, actuarial or pension consulting advice or services.

Images and photographs are included for the sole purpose of visually enhancing the site. None of them are photographs of current or former clients. They should not be construed as an endorsement or testimonial from any of the persons in the photographs.

Please see our online privacy policy.

PAST RESULTS ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS NO GUARANTEE THAT ANY INVESTMENT WILL ACHIEVE ITS GOALS AND GENERATE PROFITS OR AVOID LOSSES.

Definitions

Alternative investments: strategies that produce returns by taking risk other than equity and bond risk.

Bond: A debt security that shows ownership in a corporation or represents a claim in the corporation assets and earnings.

Correlation: a statistical measure of how two securities move in relation to each other.

Long: Buying an asset such as a stock, commodity or currency, with the expectation that the asset will rise in value.

Short: Buying an asset such as a stock, commodity or currency, with the expectation that the asset will decrease in value.

Stock: A security that shows ownership in a corporation or represents a claim in the corporation assets and earnings.

True diversifiers: investment strategies that have historically provided investors with at least 70% of the return of the traditional 60/40 stocks and bonds portfolios while having less than .30 bear correlation to traditional 60/40 stocks and bonds portfolios.